Humans did not evolve alongside other life on Earth

Dr Ellis Silver thinks that he might have spotted a few telltale signs that humans did not evolve alongside other life on Earth, and that we’re actually beings from another world.

In his book, HUMANS ARE NOT FROM EARTH: A SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION OF THE EVIDENCE, the ecologist writes the human race has defects that mark it of being ‘not of this world’.

Dr Ellis Silver points to a number of physiological features to make his case for why humans did not evolve alongside other life on Earth. They range from humans suffering from bad backs – which he suggests is because we evolved in a world with lower gravity – to getting too easily sunburned and having difficulty giving birth.

‘Mankind is supposedly the most highly developed species on the planet, yet is surprisingly unsuited and ill-equipped for Earth’s environment: harmed by sunlight, a strong dislike for naturally occurring foods, ridiculously high rates of chronic disease, and more’

‘This suggests (to me at least) that mankind may have evolved on a different planet, and we may have been brought here as a highly developed species.’

‘One reason for this … is that the Earth might be a prison planet, since we seem to be a naturally violent species and we’re here until we learn to behave ourselves,’ he said.

Dr Ellis said the book is intended to create debate, instead of being a scientific study and hopes it will lead to people getting in touch with him with further suggestions of ‘evidence’.

Lets keep in mind that other scientists have said some bacteria arrived on Earth from space. And you also might have heard about the Annunaki!

‘My thesis proposes that mankind did not evolve from that particular strain of life, but evolved elsewhere and was transported to Earth (as fully evolved Homo sapiens) between 60,000 and 200,000 years ago,’ he says.

5 Comments on “Humans did not evolve alongside other life on Earth”

  1. Hmmm? Of course, I am only a layperson and do not have that much knowledge of this subject. I am still “green”, as some would say. However, I have an observation and a couple of comments and/or questions about your theory on our bodies, especially, our skin not being able to tolerate the temperatures and sunshine. African Americans and other peoples who live closer to our equator who have a lot more skin pigmentation than white skinned people do are very equipped to handle the severe heat and bright sunshine on Earth.

    I know you realize this, so you leave me with no other option than to believe you are deliberately leaving the people of color out of this theory of yours. Or, you are saying that only the humans with fair hair and skin have been transplanted to Earth from G-d knows where and the people of color whose skin can have been designed to specifically handle the weather on this planet are indigenous to Earth and us fair hair people are not? Do I, detect some subtle racism here? It is so blatant that I could not resist asking this. I could be completely wrong, of course. But, since you did not address this major flaw in this part of your theory as most scientists would it leaves me to think bad things about your theory.

  2. Twisted, perhaps the bad thoughts had already occurred to you as you text such a cogent query to this issue! Could it not be that, contrary to current “out of africa theory” which has us migrating and evolving from hot highly irradiated climates to cold therefore loosing pigmentation, we were transplanted into cold climate, from wherever, and migrated and evolved into hot highly irradiated ones! Thereby evolving extra pigmentation as protection, not forgetting that people of colour also suffer sunburn at times? This would not really require racism to be present in the theory, subtle or not!!??

    1. I agree, John Murphy. I find it frustrating how the tendency toward immediate offense over imagined prejudice often stymies intellectual debate. I think the theory that part of our population may have been transported here from elsewhere is a valid one, as well as intriguing. It brings to mind the reports of ‘Nordic’ extraterrestrials that I’ve read. Also, I find it ludicrous that someone would take offense to the tone of this article, as it suggests that the ‘transplanted’ species was physically inferior to the indigenous peoples, and regarding the fact that we all now share the same intellectual, as well as physical attributes of both indigenous and transplanted species, it suggests that the transplants needed to ‘meld’ with the indigenous in order to ensure!

  3. obviously ignoring genetic evidence of our relationship with other forms of life upon this planet and the fact that we are still evolving and are so young as a species that we haven’t really had time to evolve to suite all of the new environments we have moved into since our migrations began ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *